Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt the second limb of the offence under Section 89(1)(a) of the Penal Code, namely, that the abusive language was likely to cause a breach of the peace. Mere utterance of abusive words, without evidence of likelihood of breach of peace, is insufficient for conviction.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove all elements of the offence of stealing beyond reasonable doubt, as there was no concrete evidence linking the appellant to the theft, nor proof of intent to permanently deprive the owner. The conviction and sentence were unjustified and must be quashed.
Source excerpt
The evidence did not establish that the appellant used any weapon against the victim or threatened her in order to obtain or retain the property; therefore, the essential elements of armed robbery were not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed the conviction, and set aside the sentence after finding the charge for obtaining money by false pretence was defective.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal after finding the charge sheet defective for omitting essential elements of attempted rape, quashing the conviction and sentence.
The High Court of Tanzania allowed a criminal appeal after finding the charge for obtaining by false pretenses was defective because it omitted an essential allegation of intent to defraud.
Omission of the victim's age in the particulars of the charge sheet for rape is a fatal defect that prejudiced the appellant, rendering the trial, proceedings, and judgment a nullity; such omission is not curable under section 388(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Source excerpt
Omission of the victim's age in the particulars of the charge sheet for rape is an incurable defect, prejudicing the appellant and vitiating the trial; conviction and sentence must be quashed.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashing a conviction for obtaining money by false pretence after finding the prosecution had not proved intent to defraud beyond reasonable doubt.
The charge sheet failed to disclose the essential element of threatening required under section 132(2)(a) of the Penal Code, rendering it incurably defective and invalidating the conviction and sentence.
Source excerpt
Explore more
