Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court held that there was no error apparent on the face of the record in the appellate judgment, as the appellate judge's decision was based not only on procedural irregularity but also on the merits of the evidence. The applicant's ground required detailed argument and was not self-evident. Therefore, review was not warranted and the application was dismissed.
Source excerpt
The grounds raised by the applicant do not constitute errors apparent on the face of the record but are instead grounds for appeal. The applicant is seeking a re-determination of issues already decided, which is not permissible in review. The application for review is therefore without merit.
Source excerpt
The application does not disclose a manifest error apparent on the face of the record, nor does the discovery of a 2016 Court of Appeal decision constitute new and important evidence. The application is an appeal in disguise and not maintainable as a review.
Source excerpt
Review application partly allowed after the Court found a manifest record error on applicants’ directorship, but rejected complaints about non-joinder.
The Court of Appeal reviewed its earlier decision, correcting an erroneous finding that certain applicants were directors, but upheld its treatment of non-joinder objections.
The applicants failed to demonstrate an error apparent on the face of the record or any other sufficient reason for review. The alleged error was a legal argument suitable for appeal, not review. The application for review is rejected with costs.
Source excerpt
Explore more
