Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The trial Tribunal acted within its discretion and legal mandate in setting aside the ex parte proof order after finding that the respondent demonstrated sufficient cause, including the right to legal representation and language difficulties. There was no illegality or procedural impropriety warranting revision by the High Court.
Source excerpt
The High Court Land Division dismissed an application to set aside an ex parte injunction ruling, finding the applicants had not shown merit or changed circumstances.
The Tribunal contravened Regulation 13(2) by entering an ex parte order against the appellant when his advocate was absent for only one date without good cause; the appellant was denied the right to be heard.
Source excerpt
Misc. Application No. 163 of 2023 was res subjudice to Misc. Application No. 323 of 2021, rendering the proceedings and order a nullity. The tribunal erred by entertaining a second execution application while the first was pending. Revision was an appropriate remedy given the irregularity.
Source excerpt
Both preliminary objections lack merit as the affidavit was sufficiently ratified and knowledgeable, and delay in filing was justified by technical failure in eCMS system.
Source excerpt
The High Court struck out an application to vacate an ex parte order, holding it was filed out of time because limitation ran from the order date, not awareness.
The High Court struck out a land revision application after finding it had been overtaken by events because the challenged decree had already been executed.
The DLHT was justified in setting aside its previous ex parte order to afford both parties a fair hearing, as required by law. The appeal lacked merit because the appellant was given an opportunity to present his case after the ex parte order was set aside, and the grounds raised were not relevant to the appellate stage.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a land appeal, holding that an alleged failure to formally set aside an ex parte order did not vitiate the proceedings where both sides were heard.
The trial court proceedings were a nullity due to confusion and irregularity arising from withdrawal of the first appellant's suit, improper participation of parties, and inconsistency between the court record and judgment.
Source excerpt
Explore more
