JUDGMENT TANESCO vs
The respondents failed to prove unfair termination or legitimate expectation of renewal. The contracts were for specific tasks and expired automatically. The CMA erred in finding unfair termination and awarding reliefs, as the evidence and legal standards were not met. The arbitrator did not properly evaluate the evidence, and the reliefs granted were not justified.
Source excerpt
- Unfair termination
- Fixed term contracts
- Procedural fairness
- Jurisdiction of cma
- Public service employment