Muhisi
Plaintiffs failed to prove ownership of the business stalls as they did not have title to the land, which was lawfully owned by the 1st defendant. The 1st defendant was justified in demolishing the stalls after proper notice, and any loss suffered by the plaintiffs was voluntarily assumed by their refusal to mitigate after notice. No compensable loss attributable to the defendants was established.
Source excerpt
- Ownership of land
- Demolition of property
- Compensation for loss
- Evidentiary burden
- Government land rights