paschal bandiho vs arusha urban water supply sewarage authority auwsa 2023 tzca 17834 14 november 2023
The Court held that the applicant's grounds for review—alleged manifest error, nullity, or illegality—were unsubstantiated and largely challenged the procedure and evidence in subordinate tribunals, which is outside the scope of review. No manifest error, illegality, or fraud was demonstrated on the face of the Court's judgment to justify review.
Source excerpt
- Review of appellate judgment
- Jurisdiction of appellate court
- Labour dispute termination
- Manifest error on record
- Illegality and fraud in judgments