Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court at Kigoma dismissed a criminal appeal against an incest conviction, upholding a 30-year sentence and finding the prosecution proved its case.
The trial court's failure to comply with mandatory procedural requirements under section 231 of the Criminal Procedure Act, including informing the accused of his rights and properly admitting evidence, resulted in a prejudicial and unfair trial, necessitating nullification of proceedings and retrial.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to weak identification evidence and failure to call a material witness, making it unsafe to convict the appellant.
Source excerpt
The conviction was quashed because the prosecution failed to prove the offence of incest by male beyond reasonable doubt due to material contradictions in the evidence, variance between the charge and the evidence, and lack of proof of sexual intercourse.
Source excerpt
The High Court upheld Abdallah Muna’s 30-year sentence for incest by male, finding the victim’s identification and evidence proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
The appeal was filed outside the extended time limit and the Notice of Appeal was not validly issued or signed by the appellant, rendering the appeal incompetent.
Source excerpt
The conviction and sentence for rape were quashed because the proper charge should have been incest, not rape, given the biological relationship between the accused and the victim. The omission of the sentencing provision in the unnatural offence charge was not fatal and did not prejudice the appellant. Contradictions in prosecution evidence were minor and did not affect the core issue. The appellant was denied a fair trial regarding witness protection, so the evidence of the protected witness and related exhibit were expunged. The conviction and sentence for unnatural offence were upheld as…
Source excerpt
The conviction was quashed because the testimony of the child victim was not properly admitted in accordance with Section 127(2) of the Evidence Act, rendering it of no evidential value, and there was no other evidence to prove the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
The court found that the prosecution proved the offence of incest by male beyond reasonable doubt through credible and corroborated evidence of the victim and her mother, with no material contradictions undermining the case. The alleged double jeopardy was rejected as the previous and current charges were for different offences committed at different times with different ingredients.
Source excerpt
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant committed incest by male against his daughter on 25.12.2021, based on the credible and detailed testimony of the victim, corroborated by other witnesses regarding the pattern of abuse, and the alleged contradictions or extraneous matters did not prejudice the appellant or affect the fairness of the trial.
Source excerpt
Explore more
