CIVIL APPEAL NO
The appeal fails as no evidence supports claims of bias, reliance on false affidavit, misapprehension of marital status, disregard of 'en ventre sa mere', or deliberate concealment of heirs. The trial court acted impartially, evaluated evidence properly, recognized the second appellant as a child of the deceased, and the process of identifying heirs was ongoing and consensual.
Source excerpt
- Revocation of letters of administration
- Judicial bias
- Concealment of heirs
- Inheritance rights of unborn children
- Burden of proof in marriage claims