Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Plaintiff established existence of loan agreement and defendant's default; evidence and pleadings proved claims on balance of probabilities, entitling plaintiff to all reliefs sought.
Source excerpt
The High Court at Shinyanga recorded a consent settlement, adopted the deed of settlement as judgment and decree, waived costs, and marked the suit settled.
The High Court in Mbeya found that Amosi Luvanda breached a loan agreement with Lulu Saccoss Ltd. and ordered payment of the debt, damages, interest, and costs.
The High Court entered judgment on admission after the defendants admitted the plaintiff’s claim for unpaid goods and agreed to pay in two installments.
The dispute was resolved by a deed of settlement, which constitutes the judgment and decree of the court, marking the suit as settled by compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Source excerpt
The Court entered judgment by consent based on the Deed of Settlement, ordering payment of the principal sum and costs, with waiver of damages and interest, and settlement of all claims conclusively.
Source excerpt
The applicant demonstrated sufficient facts and a reasonable defence to justify leave to defend, particularly as the claims for damages and interest are discretionary and not strictly pleaded as unlawful occupation.
Source excerpt
The plaintiffs proved their claims on a balance of probabilities, and the defendants' failure to appear or defend resulted in judgment for breach of contract and award of the claimed amounts, damages, interest, and costs.
Source excerpt
The High Court upheld a petroleum supplier’s claim, finding a binding credit-supply contract, breach by non-payment, and proved outstanding debt.
The High Court held that the defendants breached fuel supply, equipment, and transport agreements, and upheld guarantees against the 2nd and 3rd defendants.
Explore more
