Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Employment law WISEWAYS JUDGMENET AND DECREE

WISEWAYS JUDGMENET AND DECREE

The High Court granted summary judgment for unpaid NSSF contributions, penalties, interest, and costs after the defendant failed to appear.

  • Statutory contributions
  • Default in remittance
  • Summary judgment
  • Interest on decretal sum
  • Summary-judgment
  • Statutory-contributions
Read case analysis
Contract law Zongii Vs

Zongii Vs

The High Court found a contract for hiring dump trucks and a water bowser existed, held the defendant breached it by non-payment, and awarded the plaintiff the outstanding invoices, damages, interest, and costs.

  • Breach of contract
  • Damages
  • Interest on decretal sum
  • Burden of proof
  • Breach-of-contract
  • Contract-damages
Read case analysis
Civil procedure exim bank tanzania limited vs abeed m manji 2024 tzca 87 22 february 2024

exim bank tanzania limited vs abeed m manji 2024 tzca 87 22 february 2024

The applicant demonstrated good cause for extension of time due to a defective certificate of delay not attributable to the applicant and the presence of apparent illegalities in the High Court judgment. Granting extension would not prejudice the respondent and serves the overriding objective of expeditious justice.

  • Extension of time
  • Certificate of delay
  • Illegality as ground for extension
  • Vicarious liability
  • Interest on decretal sum
Read case analysis
Civil procedure CIVIL APPEAL NO

CIVIL APPEAL NO

Execution orders from the Resident Magistrate’s Court, except those specifically listed in section 74(1) and Order XL Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, are not appealable to the High Court. The appellant’s appeal against the execution order is incompetent and must be struck out. The proper remedy is revision, not appeal.

  • Appealability of execution orders
  • Interest on decretal sum
  • Res judicata
  • Execution proceedings
Read case analysis
Banking law habibu african banking vs kassim ally suleiman ta chimwaga hardware 2023 tzhccomd 303 28 august 2023

habibu african banking vs kassim ally suleiman ta chimwaga hardware 2023 tzhccomd 303 28 august 2023

The defendant, as sole proprietor of Chimwaga Hardware, is personally liable for the loan advanced under the business name. The plaintiff proved the existence and amount of the outstanding loan and the legal creation of securities. The defendant's arguments regarding party identity and attestation were unfounded. Judgment is entered for the plaintiff for the proven amount, with interest and costs.

  • Loan default
  • Breach of contract
  • Enforcement of securities
  • Interest on decretal sum
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure fabec investment ltd and another vs simba pipe industries ltd 2023 tzhc 17221 21 april 2023

fabec investment ltd and another vs simba pipe industries ltd 2023 tzhc 17221 21 april 2023

The High Court partly allowed an appeal against judgment on admission, setting aside interest awarded on an unadmitted claim and remitting disputed issues for rehearing.

  • Judgment on admission
  • Interest on decretal sum
  • Right to be heard
  • Natural justice
  • Civil-procedure
  • Judgment-on-admission
Read case analysis
Contract law MEK ONE GENERAL TRADERS CO

MEK ONE GENERAL TRADERS CO

A valid contractual relationship existed as evidenced by invoices, purchase orders, and part payments; the defendant breached the contract by failing to pay the outstanding amount; the plaintiff is entitled to the outstanding sum, interest, general damages, and costs.

  • Breach of contract
  • Supply agreement
  • Default judgment
  • Damages
  • Interest on decretal sum
Read case analysis
Insurance law RAPHAEL LOGISTICS T LTD VS PHOENIX T ASSURANCE CO

RAPHAEL LOGISTICS T LTD VS PHOENIX T ASSURANCE CO

The accident was covered under the marine insurance policy; exclusions under ICCA did not apply as the crane was not subject to packaging/preparation and proximate cause was marine peril. Defendant breached the contract by unjustified repudiation. Plaintiff entitled to compensation as admitted by defendant's own assessor, but not to full claimed amount due to lack of strict proof.

  • Marine insurance
  • Breach of contract
  • Proximate cause
  • Policy exclusions
  • Subrogation
  • Special damages
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.