Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure RULING JOSEPH MWAMBENJA VS FURAHA MALUNDI

RULING JOSEPH MWAMBENJA VS FURAHA MALUNDI

The High Court struck out a civil revision application as incompetent, holding that it could not revise an interlocutory order re-admitting an appeal in the District Court.

  • Revision
  • Supervisory jurisdiction
  • Interlocutory orders
  • Appealability
  • Preliminary objection
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RULING LUCAS MWAMPEZA VS AIDAN MSIGWA

RULING LUCAS MWAMPEZA VS AIDAN MSIGWA

The High Court cannot entertain revision of interlocutory orders in pending cases under section 44(1)(b) of the MCA and section 79(1) of the CPC, as such orders do not finally determine the rights of the parties. Supervisory powers under section 44(1)(a) of the MCA are exercisable only suo moto by the court, not by application. The application is therefore incompetent.

  • Revision
  • Supervisory jurisdiction
  • Interlocutory orders
  • Preliminary objection
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RULING OF RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY final

RULING OF RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY final

The High Court struck out an appeal against a garnishee order nisi, holding the order was interlocutory and not appealable under the Civil Procedure Code.

  • Appeals
  • Execution proceedings
  • Garnishee orders
  • Interlocutory orders
  • Civil-procedure
  • Execution-proceedings
Read case analysis
Labour law NYANZA ROAD Ruling5

NYANZA ROAD Ruling5

A condonation order by CMA allowing a dispute to proceed is interlocutory and does not finally determine the rights of the parties; therefore, a revision application challenging such an order is incompetent and premature under Rule 50 of Labour Court Rules, GN No. 106 of 2007.

  • Condonation
  • Interlocutory orders
  • Revision
  • Procedure before cma
Read case analysis
Criminal law RULING Boniface Jacob final

RULING Boniface Jacob final

The application is incompetent as it seeks revision of an interlocutory order, which is barred by section 43(2) MCA and section 372(2) CPA. The prayers in the application are related and not opposed, so the omnibus objection fails. The proper order for an incompetent application is to strike it out, not dismiss it.

  • Interlocutory orders
  • Revision jurisdiction
  • Omnibus applications
Read case analysis
Criminal law RULING Juma Hassan Chinga

RULING Juma Hassan Chinga

The application is incompetent because it seeks revision of an interlocutory order that does not finally determine the criminal charge, which is expressly precluded by section 372(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act and section 43(2) of the Magistrates’ Court Act.

  • Revision
  • Interlocutory orders
  • Jurisdiction
  • Admission of evidence
Read case analysis
Family law Ruling BETRHA CHARLES v MAKOYE ATHUMANI

Ruling BETRHA CHARLES v MAKOYE ATHUMANI

The District Court's decision setting aside the trial court's refusal to set aside an ex parte decision on division of matrimonial property is not interlocutory because it suspends enforcement of rights already adjudged and affects the parties' substantive rights. Appeals in matrimonial proceedings are governed by the Law of Marriage Act, which allows such appeals. The preliminary objection is without merit and is overruled.

  • Matrimonial proceedings
  • Appeals
  • Interlocutory orders
  • Division of matrimonial property
Read case analysis
Criminal law Republic vs Benedicto Ernest Njato Hondo Another

Republic vs Benedicto Ernest Njato Hondo Another

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to revise interlocutory orders of subordinate courts unless such orders have the effect of finally determining the criminal charge; the application was incompetent as the order in question did not have such effect.

  • Revision
  • Interlocutory orders
  • Admissibility of evidence
Read case analysis
Land law the registered trustees of masjid al azhal and another v assistant registrar of titles and another 2024 tzhc 770 12 march 2024

the registered trustees of masjid al azhal and another v assistant registrar of titles and another 2024 tzhc 770 12 march 2024

The High Court granted a status quo order pending appeal in a land register rectification matter, finding the notice could adversely affect the appellant.

  • Rectification of land register
  • Interlocutory orders
  • Maintenance of status quo
  • Land-register-rectification
  • Status-quo-order
  • Interlocutory-applications
Read case analysis
Civil procedure jacquiline t limited vs exim bank t limited 2024 tzca 158 29 february 2024

jacquiline t limited vs exim bank t limited 2024 tzca 158 29 february 2024

The Court of Appeal struck out a revision application, holding the High Court ruling was interlocutory and therefore barred by section 5(2)(d) of the AJA.

  • Revision jurisdiction
  • Interlocutory orders
  • Jurisdiction of high court
  • Execution of decrees
  • Matrimonial property
  • Revision-jurisdiction
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.