republic vs seleman so athuman another 2006 tzhc 146 10 march 2006
The prosecution evidence was fundamentally contradictory, unreliable, and discredited, with confessions obtained by torture and procedural irregularities in recording statements. No reasonable tribunal could convict on such evidence; therefore, the accused have no case to answer.
Source excerpt
- Murder
- No case to answer
- Confession evidence
- Procedural irregularities
- Investigation standards