20090213 TZHC NA
The court found that the purported lien instrument was not signed by the 1st plaintiff and was therefore not authentic. Even if it had been, the defendant bank breached its duty of care by failing to notify and obtain consent from both joint account holders and by not advising the plaintiffs to seek independent legal advice. The bank's actions were negligent and unauthorized, entitling the plaintiffs to relief.
Source excerpt
- Banker-customer relationship
- Duty of care
- Joint accounts
- Lien
- Forgery
- Damages