METL
The court held that it has jurisdiction to grant interim relief in support of foreign-seated arbitration because the alleged breaches and subject matter are situated in Tanzania, and the arbitration agreement permits recourse to ordinary courts for interim measures. The applicant satisfied the requirements for an interim injunction: there is a serious question to be tried, irreparable harm is likely if the injunction is not granted, and the balance of convenience favors the applicant. The absence of a counter affidavit from the respondent further supported granting the ex parte order.
Source excerpt
- Interim injunction
- Jurisdiction of courts
- Arbitration agreements
- Exclusive distributorship
- Breach of contract