NUSURA MUSTAPHA KOORUGENDO
The respondent, as administratrix, acted against the interests of the beneficiaries by failing to consult them, distributing the estate unfairly, and including a non-heir as beneficiary. The Primary Court retained jurisdiction to revoke her appointment even after inventory filing. The District Court erred in setting aside the revocation and in failing to provide adequate directives. The appeal is allowed, the District Court's decision is set aside, and the Primary Court's revocation of the respondent is upheld.
Source excerpt
- Revocation of administrator
- Distribution of estate
- Jurisdiction of primary court
- Fiduciary duties of administrator