NGUNULA
The trial court had jurisdiction as the DPP's consent and certificate were properly admitted; the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was found in unlawful possession of government trophies; the chain of custody was maintained; the appellant's defence was considered; and the exhibits were properly admitted in compliance with legal requirements.
Source excerpt
- Unlawful possession of government trophy
- Jurisdiction of subordinate courts in economic offences
- Chain of custody
- Admissibility of evidence
- Burden of proof
- Procedure for search and seizure