Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The tribunal erred by failing to join the village council as a necessary party, which is fatal to the proceedings and renders the tribunal's decision void.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed the appellant’s land ownership claim but set aside the tribunal’s declaration that the respondents were lawful owners.
The proceedings and judgment of the trial tribunal are vitiated due to non-joinder of Sukuro village, a necessary party, as both parties' claims depend on village land allocation; thus, a fair and conclusive determination is impossible without the village's participation.
Source excerpt
The appellants were not paid the requisite compensation for their land, as the payment was made to the second respondent and not to the actual landowners. The first respondent is not entitled to acquire the appellants' land without proper compensation and consultation. The trial tribunal's decision was erroneous and is set aside for the appellants.
Source excerpt
Plaintiff proved ownership of 556.27 acres by valid customary right of occupancy issued after proper procedures. Defendants' occupation was subsequent and based on allocations or purchases from villagers who could not pass valid title. Expert evidence confirmed Defendants' trespass into Plaintiff's land. Plaintiff entitled to relief against Defendants to the extent of their occupation within the suit land.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a land appeal, upholding a DLHT decision that found the respondent the lawful owner and rejected claims of faulty allocation and procedural defects.
The High Court dismissed a land dispute over business huts at Mikumi, holding the plaintiffs had only limited occupation rights and that the council lawfully claimed rent.
The Commissioner for Lands was a necessary party as both parties claimed allocation by him, and effective determination of ownership required his participation; failure to join him rendered the trial incompetent.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a land trespass claim as time-barred, holding that the suit was filed outside the 12-year limitation period for recovery of land.
The High Court dismissed a land suit after finding the plaintiff failed to prove Plot 149 Block N existed or that he held valid title or a completed transfer.
Explore more
