Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court dismissed a land review application, holding that the applicant raised appeal issues rather than an error apparent on the face of the record or new evidence.
Vianzi Village Council was a necessary party for fair and conclusive determination of the ownership dispute, as the allocation and alleged double allocation of the suit property was central to the case. The Tribunal erred by proceeding without the Village Council after striking out its name without proper scrutiny of the pleadings.
Source excerpt
Second appeal in a criminal trespass matter. The High Court quashed the first appellate judgment for failure to analyze the evidence and remitted the case for rehearing.
Applicants failed to demonstrate a strong prima facie case or good and arguable case for ownership of the disputed land, failed to show irreparable harm or that granting the injunction would be just and justifiable, and did not rebut evidence of respondents' lawful possession and third-party lease.
Source excerpt
The absence of necessary parties, specifically land authorities and the Attorney General, in a dispute over registered land renders the proceedings, judgment, and decree of the District Land and Housing Tribunal a nullity, necessitating fresh proceedings before the competent court with all necessary parties joined.
Source excerpt
The appeal was allowed because the criminal trespass charge was premature due to unresolved land ownership, and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt as no eye witness was called and the evidence was hearsay.
Source excerpt
Existence of a land ownership dispute precludes criminal conviction for trespass and theft; criminal courts lack jurisdiction to resolve ownership; conviction, sentences, and compensation orders quashed.
Source excerpt
High Court criminal appeal allowed where theft charges over trees failed amid an unresolved land ownership dispute, with convictions and sentences quashed.
The High Court dismissed a Mareva injunction application over disputed land near Tarangire National Park, finding delay, no entitlement, and environmental concerns.
Where ownership of land is disputed, a primary court lacks jurisdiction to determine criminal trespass until a competent civil court has resolved the ownership issue. The lower courts erred by determining ownership and convicting the appellant for criminal trespass, rendering their decisions null for want of jurisdiction.
Source excerpt
Explore more
