Esheria Tanzania Case Law
Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter Tanzania case law

Results update automatically as you type.

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Human rights law centre on housing rights and evictions v sudan communication 296 of 2005 2006 achpr 70 25 may 2006

centre on housing rights and evictions v sudan communication 296 of 2005 2006 achpr 70 25 may 2006

Court
ACHPR

Given the scale, seriousness, and ongoing nature of the alleged human rights violations in Darfur, and the displacement and intimidation of victims, local remedies in Sudan are deemed unavailable, ineffective, and insufficient. The matter has not been specifically settled by any UN treaty or Charter body. Therefore, the communication satisfies the admissibility requirements under Article 56 of the African Charter.

Source excerpt

  • Right to life
  • Right to security of person
  • Right to property
  • Right to adequate housing
  • Right to food
  • Right to water
Read case analysis
International human rights law democratic republic of congo v burundi and others communication 227 of 1999 2003 achpr 41 29 may 2003

democratic republic of congo v burundi and others communication 227 of 1999 2003 achpr 41 29 may 2003

Court
ACHPR

The armed intervention, occupation, and actions of Burundi, Rwanda, and Uganda in the eastern provinces of the DRC constituted violations of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, including the rights to self-determination, peace and security, property, health, education, and the free disposal of natural resources. The Commission found that the Respondent States' conduct, including massacres, rapes, deportations, looting, and occupation, was inconsistent with their obligations under the Charter and international law. The Commission relied on Articles 2, 4, 5, 12(1) and (2), 14, 16,…

Source excerpt

  • Armed aggression
  • State responsibility
  • Massive human rights violations
  • Self-determination
  • Illegal exploitation of natural resources
  • Reparations
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.