Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court dismissed a matrimonial-property appeal after finding the appellant filed submissions outside the court-ordered deadline and had failed to prosecute the appeal.
The respondent contributed TZS 50,000 to the purchase of the matrimonial house during marriage, satisfying the requirements of section 114 of the Law of Marriage Act for division of matrimonial property. The trial court's award of 35% to the respondent was based on evidence and proper legal principles. The appellant's arguments regarding asset acquisition before marriage, sentimental value, and valuation were either unsupported by evidence or legally irrelevant. The appeal lacks merit and is dismissed.
Source excerpt
The first appellate court's judgment was defective for failing to address the grounds of appeal, lacking analysis of submissions, and improperly handling electronic evidence; the judgment must be set aside and the case remitted for a fresh judgment.
Source excerpt
The District Court erred in law and fact by ignoring the amended petition of appeal, as the original petition ceased to exist upon amendment. The proceedings and judgment of the District Court are a nullity and must be set aside. The matter is remitted for proper hearing based on a valid amended petition of appeal.
Source excerpt
The trial court's judgment on division of matrimonial property was vitiated by failure to properly analyze and record the extent of each party's contribution, constituting a serious irregularity and potential miscarriage of justice. The right to be heard was not violated at the first appellate court.
Source excerpt
The appellate court lacked jurisdiction to determine the name issue as it was a factual matter not raised at trial; the marriage had irreparably broken down for multiple reasons beyond cruelty; and the division of matrimonial property at 60% to the appellant and 40% to the respondent was justified based on both direct and indirect contributions during the marriage.
Source excerpt
The High Court partly allowed a matrimonial appeal, mostly upholding custody and maintenance while varying child maintenance and adjusting property division.
The appellate court erred by raising and deciding on the issue of child maintenance, which was not appealed against, without affording the parties the right to be heard. This denial of the right to be heard vitiated the proceedings and judgment, rendering them a nullity.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed an appeal over matrimonial property division, holding that the house was properly treated as matrimonial property and the reconciliation certificate was sufficient.
On second appeal, the High Court upheld divorce and division of property, finding the dispute had been referred to the Marriage Conciliation Board and the land was matrimonial property.
Explore more
