Esheria Tanzania Case Law
Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter Tanzania case law

Results update automatically as you type.

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law Petro Misana Judgment

Petro Misana Judgment

Court
TANZLII

The consent to prosecute was invalid as it was issued by the Regional Prosecution Officer under section 26(1) EOCCA, a power solely vested in the DPP and non-delegable. The trial court therefore lacked jurisdiction, rendering the proceedings, conviction, and sentence a nullity. The defect is not curable under section 388 of the CPA. A retrial is ordered before a competent magistrate.

Source excerpt

  • Embezzlement
  • Misappropriation
  • Abuse of position
  • Jurisdiction
  • Consent to prosecute
  • Delegation of prosecutorial powers
Read case analysis
Criminal law Respicius Ruling

Respicius Ruling

Court
TANZLII

The High Court at Mwanza granted bail to the applicant in an economic crimes case, subject to strict statutory conditions because the alleged loss exceeded TZS 2 billion.

  • Bail
  • Embezzlement
  • Misappropriation
  • Organized crime
  • Public official misconduct
  • Economic-crimes
Read case analysis
Criminal law Yusta Misc Criminal Application No 26507

Yusta Misc Criminal Application No 26507

Court
TANZLII

The High Court granted bail to five applicants in an economic offences case, imposing statutory cash deposit, surety, travel, and attendance conditions.

  • Bail
  • Economic and organized crime control
  • Forgery
  • Embezzlement
  • Misappropriation
  • Public interest
Read case analysis
Criminal law andrew peter andrew rutabagisha andrew joseph v the republic 2023 tzhc 23785 20 november 2023

andrew peter andrew rutabagisha andrew joseph v the republic 2023 tzhc 23785 20 november 2023

Court
TZHC

The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, holding that the prosecution failed to prove embezzlement beyond reasonable doubt and quashed the conviction and sentence.

  • Embezzlement
  • Misappropriation
  • Use of false documents
  • Burden of proof
  • Chain of custody
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law FLOLIAN KAIZILEGE METHOD JUDGMENT FINAL

FLOLIAN KAIZILEGE METHOD JUDGMENT FINAL

Court
TANZLII

The charge on which the appellant was convicted did not disclose the ingredients of the offence under section 15(1)(a) of the Prevention and Combating of Corruption Act, rendering the proceedings, conviction, and sentence a nullity. Even if the charge were proper, the trial court erred by imposing a custodial sentence without considering the statutory option of a fine for a first offender who pleaded guilty.

Source excerpt

  • Corrupt transactions
  • Defective charge
  • Plea of guilty
  • Sentencing discretion
  • Option of fine
  • Misappropriation
Read case analysis
Criminal law CRIMINAL APPEAL NO

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO

Court
TANZLII

The appellant was convicted on the same counts she was charged with under the Prevention and Combating of Corruption Act; the trial court did not create new offences or apply laws to convict her outside the charge. The evidence established that the appellant, as imprest holder, retired funds for a ceremony and gifts that never occurred, using false documents. The prosecution proved the offences beyond reasonable doubt. The sentence and compensation order were within statutory limits and lawfully imposed.

Source excerpt

  • Use of documents intended to mislead principal
  • Embezzlement
  • Misappropriation
  • Burden of proof
  • Evaluation of evidence
  • Right to be heard
Read case analysis
Criminal law Richard Bundala case

Richard Bundala case

Court
TANZLII

The trial court lacked jurisdiction because the consent was issued by the Regional Prosecution Officer under the wrong provision, which is not delegable from the DPP. This procedural defect is fatal and renders the entire proceedings and conviction a nullity.

Source excerpt

  • Jurisdiction
  • Consent of dpp
  • Embezzlement
  • Misappropriation
  • Stealing by agent
  • Procedural irregularity
Read case analysis
Criminal law CRM

CRM

Court
TANZLII

The conviction and sentences imposed on the appellant were based solely on documentary exhibits that were not read out after being admitted in evidence, violating mandatory procedural requirements and denying the appellant a fair trial. Once those exhibits are expunged, no evidence remains to support the conviction beyond reasonable doubt.

Source excerpt

  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Documentary evidence
  • Right to fair trial
  • Standard of proof
  • Forgery
  • Embezzlement
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.