Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal challenging convictions for unlawful possession of government trophies and ammunition, upholding the 20-year sentence.
After a guilty plea to manslaughter, the High Court fined no further terms and imposed 1 year 7 months in prison, factoring self-defence, confession, and custody time.
The accused was found guilty of manslaughter based on his unequivocal plea of guilty and the facts admitted. The court found significant mitigating factors, including provocation, self-defence, lack of intent, and the accused's youth, warranting a lenient sentence of conditional discharge.
Source excerpt
The sentence was determined by weighing aggravating factors (serious injury, permanent incapacitation, use of lethal weapon) against mitigating factors (provocation, first offender, dependants, remorse, cooperation, time in remand), resulting in a custodial sentence reduced for early plea, mitigating circumstances, and time spent in remand.
Source excerpt
The accused pleaded guilty to manslaughter after a domestic violence incident. The High Court convicted her and granted an absolute discharge.
The accused, acting as a watchman, used force in self-defence against an armed intruder, resulting in death. The circumstances and mitigating factors justify absolute discharge.
Source excerpt
The trial court failed to comply with section 312(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act by not specifying the punishment and not recording mitigation before sentencing, necessitating remittal for proper procedure.
Source excerpt
The High Court upheld the guilty pleas and charge, but found the 20-year sentence excessive and reduced it, ordering the appellants’ immediate release unless otherwise lawfully held.
The offence of impregnating a school girl under section 60A of the Education Act does not require DPP consent; the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant impregnated the victim while she was a student; DNA evidence is not a legal requirement for conviction; the appellant was not a minor at the time of the offence; however, the trial court failed to consider unique mitigating circumstances, making the sentence and compensation excessive and inappropriate.
Source excerpt
The trial magistrate exercised discretion properly in ordering forfeiture and considered mitigation; however, the fines imposed on minors should have been directed to their parents or guardians as per the Law of the Child Act.
Source excerpt
Explore more
