EZEKIEL KIMOLO
The appeal was dismissed because the trial tribunal properly evaluated the evidence, the Village Land Act was not contravened as the land was not village land at the time of sale, and procedural omissions did not prejudice the appellants. The respondents' evidence of ownership was stronger and the appellants failed to prove their acquisition of the suit land.
Source excerpt
- Ownership of village land
- Sale of land
- Procedural irregularities
- Evaluation of evidence