Tanzania Case Law

kitindi kimaro vs anthony ngoo another 2018 tzca 567 16 july 2018

Court

TZCA

The applicant failed to establish a manifest error on the face of the record in the prior decision; the alleged errors required elaborate argument and were not self-evident. Dissatisfaction with the Court's interpretation or failure to consider certain statutory provisions does not justify review under Rule 66(1)(a).

Source excerpt

• Review of appellate decisions
• Manifest error on the face of the record
• Partnership law
• Interpretation of partnership agreements

Read case analysis

20180714 TZCA Arusha 1

Court

TZCA

The Court of Appeal dismissed an application to review its earlier decision, holding that the alleged errors were not manifest errors on the face of the record.

• Review of appellate decisions
• Manifest error on the face of the record
• Partnership law
• Interpretation of contract statutes
• Civil-procedure
• Appellate-review

Read case analysis