director of public prosecutions vs salum madito 2020 tzca 311 19 june 2020
The Court of Appeal held that the guilty plea was equivocal because the plea-taking procedure was flawed, quashed the lower courts’ decisions, and ordered re-arraignment.
- Plea taking procedure
- Equivocal plea
- Wildlife offences
- Forfeiture of property
- Equivocal-plea
- Guilty-plea-procedure