Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The application was struck out because the supporting affidavit was incurably defective for lack of endorsement and drawer's name, and the application was premature as there was no order for attachment in the pending execution proceedings.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed an application to extend time to challenge registration of an arbitral award, holding it was premature because the award had not been filed in court.
The application was premature and contravened rules 11(4) and 11(7)(d) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009, as there was no evidence of service or awareness of execution and no notice of intended execution was attached; thus, the application was incompetent and struck out.
Source excerpt
The High Court Land Division struck out a temporary injunction application as incompetent and premature because of affidavit defects and a pending related application.
The High Court struck out an application to restore mediation, holding that there was no dismissal order and the motion was therefore premature.
The applicant failed to cumulatively satisfy mandatory conditions for grant of stay of execution, specifically by not furnishing security and not attaching notice of intended execution, rendering the application premature and incompetent.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a revision application as premature, holding that an interlocutory injunction in probate revision did not determine land rights and could be challenged first below.
The High Court struck out a pre-committal bail application as premature, holding it was brought under inapplicable provisions and before proceedings were properly before the court.
The High Court dismissed an application to restrain dealings with land, holding that temporary injunction relief requires a pending suit and that a necessary purchaser had not been joined.
The High Court dismissed an application for interim restraint over land disposition because no suit was pending and a necessary purchaser had not been joined.
Explore more
