Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal for stealing by agent, holding the prosecution had not proved the alleged entrustment, bank account, or principal-agent relationship.
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent acted as an agent of Wete Town Council or had authority in recruitment, and failed to establish the essential elements of the offence. Material contradictions in prosecution evidence and lack of documentary proof undermined the case. The trial judge's acquittal was justified.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of the offence, including principal-agent relationship and corrupt solicitation/acceptance, beyond reasonable doubt. Delayed reporting, contradictory evidence, failure to call material witnesses, and improper shifting of the burden of proof rendered the conviction unsustainable.
Source excerpt
The High Court granted certification on one proposed point of law concerning interpretation of the Law of Contract Act, but declined to treat the second issue as a question of law.
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt the elements of stealing by agent, including ownership of the motorcycle, existence of a principal-agent relationship, and the fact of entrustment, as there was no documentary evidence of ownership transfer, no contract, and the motorcycle was not tendered as an exhibit. Therefore, the conviction and sentence could not stand.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal upheld the acquittal, holding that the prosecution failed to prove a principal-agent relationship, so no prima facie case was made out.
The evidence established only a buyer-seller relationship and not a principal-agent relationship. Failure to pay for goods is a civil matter, not a criminal offense. The prosecution failed to prove the charge of stealing by agent beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellants, as government agents, corruptly solicited and received a bribe in relation to their principal's affairs; contradictions in evidence were minor and did not affect the substance of the case; the conviction was based on credible evidence, not the number of witnesses.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed execution to proceed after finding that alleged payments to the judgment debtor’s former advocate were not sufficiently proved.
The High Court dismissed a second civil appeal over a cotton purchase transaction, upholding findings that the respondent proved the debt on a balance of probabilities.
Explore more
