Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law STEVEN LEONARD

STEVEN LEONARD

The High Court allowed a criminal appeal against a rape conviction, quashed the 30-year sentence, and ordered the appellant’s release.

  • Rape
  • Statutory rape
  • Burden of proof
  • Proof of age
  • Customary marriage
  • Consent
Read case analysis
Criminal law MORA DOTO

MORA DOTO

The High Court allowed a rape appeal, quashed the conviction and 30-year sentence, and ordered release after finding the victim’s age was not strictly proved.

  • Rape
  • Statutory rape
  • Burden of proof
  • Standard of proof
  • Proof of age
  • Evidence law
Read case analysis
Criminal law ALEX SAWAKA JUDGMENT edited

ALEX SAWAKA JUDGMENT edited

Appellant's age was not properly determined; trial court failed to conduct inquiry as required by law. Evidence of PW5 and PW6 expunged for lack of oath. Remaining evidence sufficient to sustain conviction, but sentencing contravened child law. Appellant was a first offender under 18; custodial sentence unlawful. Conviction stands, sentence set aside, appellant ordered released.

  • Rape
  • Unnatural offense
  • Impregnating a school girl
  • Proof of age
  • Oath and affirmation
  • Juvenile sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law DAVID LABIA HANGO Vs

DAVID LABIA HANGO Vs

The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant raped a child of tender age, with all statutory elements established through victim and corroborative evidence; procedural requirements for child witness and proof of age were satisfied.

  • Rape
  • Evidence of child witnesses
  • Proof of age
  • Identification
  • Medical evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law JOEL THOMAS

JOEL THOMAS

The prosecution failed to prove the victim's age to the required standard, which is an essential ingredient in statutory rape; therefore, the conviction cannot stand.

  • Statutory rape
  • Proof of age
  • Admissibility of evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law ELIUD NGALYA DRAFT JUDGMENT

ELIUD NGALYA DRAFT JUDGMENT

The sentence of 30 years imprisonment imposed on the appellant, who was 18 years old and a first offender, was illegal under section 131(2)(a) of the Penal Code, which mandates corporal punishment only. The prosecution proved the offence of rape beyond reasonable doubt through credible and corroborated evidence, but the sentence must be set aside and substituted with corporal punishment.

  • Rape
  • Sentencing
  • Standard of proof
  • Corporal punishment
  • Proof of age
Read case analysis
Criminal law Amani Josph v

Amani Josph v

The High Court allowed a rape appeal, quashed the conviction, and set aside a 30-year sentence after finding the victim’s age was not proved and identification was unreliable.

  • Statutory rape
  • Proof of age
  • Identification evidence
  • Burden of proof
  • Statutory-rape
  • Proof-of-age
Read case analysis
Criminal law rweyemamu zakaria

rweyemamu zakaria

The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant committed statutory rape and impregnated a schoolgirl, based on the victim's and supporting witnesses' evidence, proof of age, and corroborative documents. DNA evidence was not required, and the cautioned statement's admissibility did not affect the outcome. The appellant's defence did not raise reasonable doubt.

  • Rape
  • Impregnating a schoolgirl
  • Statutory rape
  • Defective charge
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Proof of age
Read case analysis
Criminal law mugisha innocent v republic 2024 tzhc 323 16 february 2024

mugisha innocent v republic 2024 tzhc 323 16 february 2024

The High Court allowed a rape appeal after finding the victim’s age was not proved to the required standard, so statutory rape was not established.

  • Rape
  • Statutory rape
  • Proof of age
  • Burden of proof
  • Statutory-rape
  • Proof-of-age
Read case analysis
Criminal law kennedy mahuve mjaliwa vs republic 2024 tzca 19 6 february 2024

kennedy mahuve mjaliwa vs republic 2024 tzca 19 6 february 2024

The prosecution failed to prove the offence of rape beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in the evidence, lack of credible proof of the victim's age at the material time, and unexplained delay in reporting, which undermined the credibility of the victim's testimony. The conviction was therefore unsafe and could not be sustained.

  • Rape
  • Statutory rape
  • Proof of age
  • Credibility of witnesses
  • Defective charge
  • Delayed reporting
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.