Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure HIA INSURANCE AGENCY LTD

HIA INSURANCE AGENCY LTD

The High Court ordered discovery of bank statements and contract documents, holding the application was properly before the court, relevant, and not barred by confidentiality.

  • Discovery of documents
  • Relevance of evidence
  • Confidentiality
  • Commission disputes
  • Contractual extensions
  • Discovery-of-documents
Read case analysis
Criminal law the republic vs elija thomas patrice anthony patrick 2023 tzhc 23025 22 november 2023

the republic vs elija thomas patrice anthony patrick 2023 tzhc 23025 22 november 2023

The most recent and controlling precedent is Anania Clavery Betela v. Republic, which holds that strict chain of custody is not mandatory for items not easily altered, and that witness knowledge and relevance are sufficient for admissibility. The bank slip is relevant, not easily altered, and the witness has knowledge of it; thus, it is admissible.

  • Admissibility of documentary evidence
  • Chain of custody
  • Relevance of evidence
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RULING ORASCOM VERSUS HERITAGE INSURANCE FINAL 1

RULING ORASCOM VERSUS HERITAGE INSURANCE FINAL 1

The application for discovery fails because the Applicant did not establish that the Respondent is in possession of the requested documents, and the application amounts to a fishing expedition rather than a necessary step for fair disposal of the suit. The minimum criteria for discovery under Order XI Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code were not satisfied.

  • Discovery of documents
  • Burden of proof
  • Insurance indemnity
  • Special damages
  • Relevance of evidence
Read case analysis
Civil procedure moto matiko mabanga vs ophir energy plc 2016 tzhccomd 2035 9 november 2016

moto matiko mabanga vs ophir energy plc 2016 tzhccomd 2035 9 november 2016

The interrogatories for which further answers were sought extended to seeking evidence the respondents would use at trial, rather than facts material to the issues. Such interrogatories are not permissible, and no further answers are required.

  • Interrogatories
  • Discovery
  • Sufficiency of answers
  • Relevance of evidence
Read case analysis
Civil procedure moto matiko mabanga vs ophir energy plc and 2 others 2016 tzhccomd 2027 9 november 2016

moto matiko mabanga vs ophir energy plc and 2 others 2016 tzhccomd 2027 9 november 2016

The interrogatories for which further answers were sought extended to seeking evidence that the respondents would rely on at trial, which is not permissible. Therefore, the answers provided, though objected to, were sufficient in law, and no further answers are required.

  • Interrogatories
  • Discovery
  • Sufficiency of answers
  • Relevance of evidence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.