Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Plaintiff failed to complete contractual obligations within prescribed period; LOA constituted sufficient mutual agreement; defendant did not breach contract; plaintiff estopped from relying on absence of notice to proceed, contract, or work order after commencing work under LOA.
Source excerpt
High Court appeal over a loan default dispute: the borrower breached the agreement, and there was no credible proof the bank attached or sold the motor vehicles.
The court found that the respondent did not breach the applicant's employment contract; the termination of the applicant's position resulted from the client's (Princess Leisure (T) Limited) termination of services with the respondent, not from any unlawful act by the respondent. The evidence (exhibits G2 and G3) did not amount to termination or breach by the respondent, and the respondent acted reasonably by attempting to resolve the matter and offering alternative placement.
Source excerpt
High Court land appeal dismissed: the appellant failed to show good title, as the sellers had not fully paid or validly acquired transferable title.
One appeal was dismissed as time-barred, while the other was partly allowed because no breach of contract was found before the payment period expired.
The Defendant breached the lease agreement by failing to pay the upfront rent of USD 180,000, an obligation that accrued prior to termination and survived the mutual termination as per the notice of intention to terminate and the lease agreement.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed Martha Onesmo’s appeal, holding that she breached the contract by taking and selling the motorcycle before the term ended.
The High Court found the defendant breached loan agreements with Stanbic Bank and ordered payment of the outstanding property and personal loan balances, plus interest and costs.
The High Court held that the defendant breached a land sale agreement by failing to hand over ownership documents, and ordered specific performance.
The defendant breached the sale and purchase agreement by failing to pay the outstanding purchase price for four trucks delivered by the plaintiff. The plaintiff proved its case on the balance of probability, entitling it to the outstanding amount, commercial and court interest, general damages, and costs.
Source excerpt
Explore more
