Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal dismissed an application to review its earlier land decision, holding the grounds were really an attempt to re-argue the appeal.
The applicant was not denied the right to be heard as he was afforded full opportunity to present his case in the prior appeal; the Court is not required to recall parties to address laws or authorities it may rely upon; and the grounds raised by the applicant are not proper grounds for review but rather grounds of appeal, which is not available as the Court of Appeal is the final court.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to grant a stay of execution of its own decision after it has finally determined an appeal; such jurisdiction is not conferred by the Constitution, the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, or the Court of Appeal Rules. Applications for stay are only tenable where the Court is yet to determine the challenged decision of the lower court.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed a review application, finding no manifest error, no denial of a hearing, and no substantiated bias in the earlier appeal.
The Court of Appeal dismissed a criminal review application, holding that the applicant showed no manifest error on the face of the record and sought an impermissible rehearing.
The grounds raised by the applicant do not constitute manifest errors on the face of the record, nor do they show deprivation of the right to be heard or lack of jurisdiction as required under Rule 66(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules. The application is an attempt to re-argue the case and does not meet the strict criteria for review.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed an application to review its earlier ruling, finding no manifest error on the face of the record and no denial of a hearing.
Court of Appeal review application dismissed for lack of manifest error on the face of the record; the claim sought reassessment of evidence, not review.
The Court of Appeal dismissed a review application, holding the complaint raised appeal-type issues rather than a manifest error, nullity, lack of jurisdiction, or illegality.
The Court of Appeal dismissed a review application, holding there was no manifest error, fraud, or denial of hearing in an oral service application made in court.
Explore more
