JUDGMENT RIZIKI NYELELE
The appellants were not denied the right to be heard as they were present and addressed the tribunal; the 1st appellant had no interest in the suit property and was not prejudiced by the consent judgment; the application for extension of time to review the consent judgment was an abuse of court process as there was no evidence of misrepresentation, fraud, or mistake; and the tribunal assigned reasons for its decision.
Source excerpt
- Consent judgment
- Abuse of court process
- Right to be heard
- Review of decree
- Extension of time