CIVIL APPLICATION NO 348 18 OF 2022 PAUL CHANDO VS ICEALION GENERAL INSURANCE
The Court held that the grounds raised by the applicant were not proper grounds for review but were grounds for appeal in disguise. The High Court did not err in its application of the law, nor did it commit a material irregularity. No exceptional circumstances were shown to warrant the exercise of the Court's revisional jurisdiction.
Source excerpt
- Review vs appeal
- Jurisdiction of labour court
- Unfair termination
- Compensation under employment law