Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal over unlawful possession of weapons and government trophies, upholding conviction and sentence after finding the evidence sufficient.
The prosecution proved all elements of the offence of grievous harm beyond reasonable doubt through credible and corroborated evidence; identification of the appellant was reliable both visually and by voice; there was no legal requirement to call the appellant's wife as a witness; and the trial court properly considered and rejected the appellant's defence.
Source excerpt
There was no procedural irregularity that resulted in a miscarriage of justice; the trial court complied with the relevant provisions or any lapses did not prejudice the appellant. The evidence of the child witness, corroborated by the victim's mother, was credible and sufficient to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt. The appellant's defence was considered and properly rejected.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed the conviction and set aside the sentence after finding doubts and procedural irregularities in the prosecution case.
The conviction and sentence are upheld because the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt; the failure to tender weapons and sketch map, and the absence of the doctor who conducted the post-mortem, did not prejudice the appellant or weaken the prosecution case. Contradictions in evidence were minor and did not affect the outcome. Malice aforethought was established by the appellant's conduct, the nature and number of wounds, and the use of deadly weapons.
Source excerpt
High Court upheld a conviction for animal stealing based on recent possession, but reduced the sentence from 15 years to 5 years because the appellant was a first offender.
The High Court dismissed a land appeal, upholding the tribunal’s finding that the 1st respondent lawfully owned the disputed one-acre plot and was not denied fairness.
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal challenging convictions for unlawful entry into Serengeti National Park, possession of weapons, and possession of zebra trophies.
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal challenging conviction for unlawful entry into Serengeti National Park and wildlife offences, finding no merit in the grounds raised.
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against conviction for unlawful possession of government trophies, finding no merit in complaints about witnesses, exhibits, jurisdiction, or defence.
Explore more
