Tanzania Case Law

papaa olesikaladai lendemu another vs republic 2023 tzca 51 20 february 2023

Court

TZCA

Court of Appeal upheld convictions for unlawful possession of government trophies, accepted the seizure and valuation evidence, and revised sentence to 20 years’ imprisonment.

• Unlawful possession of government trophy
• Sentencing under economic and organized crime control act
• Evidentiary requirements for seizure and valuation
• Role of independent witnesses
• Variance between charge and evidence
• Unlawful-possession-of-government-trophy

Read case analysis

JUDGMENT DAVID MARTINE MWAHAYA final

Court

TANZLII

The appellant was caught red-handed in possession of government trophy, corroborated by multiple prosecution witnesses and documentary evidence. Minor contradictions in time were immaterial. Visual identification concerns were irrelevant as the arrest occurred at the crime scene. The caution statement was properly admitted after inquiry. The absence of a local leader did not affect the legality of the search and seizure. The defence did not cast doubt on the prosecution case. The conviction and sentence were upheld.

Source excerpt

• Unlawful possession of government trophy
• Evidentiary contradictions
• Visual identification
• Admissibility of caution statement
• Role of independent witnesses
• Evaluation of defence evidence

Read case analysis

EMMANUEL BURA

Court

TANZLII

Prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that appellants were found in unlawful possession of government trophy (elephant tusks), evidence was credible, chain of custody maintained, identification and valuation properly conducted, absence of independent witnesses justified by circumstances, and no material contradictions affecting reliability.

Source excerpt

• Unlawful possession of government trophy
• Standard of proof
• Chain of custody
• Valuation of wildlife trophies
• Role of independent witnesses

Read case analysis

fahida minja kabarabara another vs republic 2009 tzhc 53 16 march 2009

Court

TZHC

The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed convictions, and set aside five-year sentences after finding serious procedural doubts in the search and evidence.

• Unlawful possession of government trophies
• Unlawful hunting
• Procedural irregularities in criminal trials
• Admissibility of evidence
• Role of independent witnesses
• Criminal-appeal

Read case analysis