job moses makassy vs republic 2017 tzhc 2234 28 june 2017
The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to unresolved inconsistencies in the evidence regarding the amount of money obtained, and the trial court failed to comply with section 226(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act by not bringing the appellant before the court after conviction in absentia, thereby denying him the right to be heard and vitiating the proceedings.
Source excerpt
- Conviction in absentia
- Burden of proof
- Right to be heard
- Section 226 criminal procedure act
- Forgery
- Obtaining money by false pretence