Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
After a guilty plea to manslaughter, the High Court assessed sentence at 3 years, reduced for plea and remand, then ordered community service subject to suitability.
The accused was found guilty of manslaughter based on his unequivocal plea of guilty and the facts admitted. The court found significant mitigating factors, including provocation, self-defence, lack of intent, and the accused's youth, warranting a lenient sentence of conditional discharge.
Source excerpt
Given the circumstances, including lack of intent to kill, provocation, self defence, first offender status, and time spent in remand, the offence falls under the low level of seriousness for manslaughter, justifying a lenient custodial sentence of two years.
Source excerpt
The evidence established that the appellant killed the deceased in circumstances amounting to self defence and without malice aforethought. The prosecution failed to prove murder beyond reasonable doubt. The conviction for murder was quashed and substituted with manslaughter, and the appellant was sentenced to time served, resulting in her immediate release.
Source excerpt
Prosecution failed to prove malice aforethought beyond reasonable doubt due to evidence of confrontation and lack of clear intent; conviction for murder not sustainable, manslaughter substituted.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove malice aforethought beyond reasonable doubt; circumstances showed a drunken fight without premeditation; accused are guilty of manslaughter, not murder.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove malice aforethought beyond reasonable doubt, as the accused successfully raised the defences of self-defence and provocation, which were not disproved by the prosecution. Consequently, the accused was convicted of manslaughter instead of murder.
Source excerpt
The accused intentionally killed the deceased by cutting her with a panga, causing fatal injuries; the prosecution proved all elements of murder beyond reasonable doubt, and the defences of self defence, provocation, and intoxication were not applicable.
Source excerpt
Court of Appeal allowed a murder appeal, holding the trial court relied on speculation and that the facts supported manslaughter after excessive force in self-defence.
The accused did not kill the deceased maliciously; the death occurred during a fight without prior quarrel or planning. The accused is therefore guilty of manslaughter, not murder.
Source excerpt
Explore more
