Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The prosecution proved the accused caused the deceased's death, but failed to establish malice aforethought due to the fight circumstances, lack of evidence of prior threats, and the deceased being the initial aggressor. Thus, the offence is manslaughter, not murder.
Source excerpt
After a guilty plea to manslaughter, the High Court fined no further terms and imposed 1 year 7 months in prison, factoring self-defence, confession, and custody time.
After a guilty plea to manslaughter, the High Court assessed sentence at 3 years, reduced for plea and remand, then ordered community service subject to suitability.
The accused, acting as a watchman, used force in self-defence against an armed intruder, resulting in death. The circumstances and mitigating factors justify absolute discharge.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove malice aforethought beyond reasonable doubt; the accused's version of self-defence was believed. The accused unlawfully caused the death of the deceased, but without the requisite intent for murder. Therefore, the accused is convicted of manslaughter, not murder.
Source excerpt
The prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt and minor contradictions in the evidence were immaterial. However, the appellant's use of force was not excessive in the circumstances, and the trial court imposed an excessive sentence by failing to consider mitigating factors. The sentence was reduced and compensation adjusted accordingly.
Source excerpt
Given the high degree of provocation, self-defence, the accused's cooperation, guilty plea, and time spent in remand, the offence was categorized as low-level manslaughter, warranting a substantially reduced custodial sentence.
Source excerpt
The accused intentionally killed the deceased with malice aforethought, as evidenced by the nature and severity of the injuries, use of lethal weapons, and post-offence conduct. The defences of self-defence and provocation were rejected as the response was grossly disproportionate and the conduct was deliberate and premeditated.
Source excerpt
The court found that although the accused caused the death of the deceased, the evidence established that the killing occurred during a fight initiated by the deceased, and there was no malice aforethought. Therefore, the accused was convicted of manslaughter, not murder.
Source excerpt
The accused caused the death of the deceased by using excessive force in self-defence during a confrontation. The prosecution failed to prove malice aforethought beyond reasonable doubt. The force used was disproportionate, making the accused liable for manslaughter under section 18B(3) of the Penal Code.
Source excerpt
Explore more
