SAUDA KIWANDA V
The court held that the applicant admitted to the misconduct both in writing and in evidence, satisfying the required standard of proof. The respondent was not required to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The applicant failed to substantiate procedural irregularities with evidence, and the issues raised at revision were not pleaded at the arbitration stage. Therefore, the termination was both substantively and procedurally fair, and there was no basis to revise the arbitral award.
Source excerpt
- Unfair termination
- Standard of proof in labour disputes
- Procedural fairness in disciplinary proceedings
- Pleadings and evidence in labour disputes