Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed a wildlife-related economic appeal, quashed convictions and set aside sentences after finding procedural defects and evidentiary inconsistencies.
The High Court dismissed an appeal against conviction for unlawful possession of government trophy, finding the evidence sufficient and the disposal procedure proper.
The prosecution failed to scientifically establish the nature of the trophies and did not prove the location of the offence within the statutory boundaries of the Serengeti National Park. The GPS map printout was not properly authenticated as electronic evidence, and the inventory form was not justified in lieu of physical exhibits. The trial court's conviction and sentence were not supported by admissible and sufficient evidence.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal over unlawful possession of weapons and government trophies, upholding conviction and sentence after finding the evidence sufficient.
Conviction and sentence quashed due to insufficient identification of government trophies, defective inventory procedure, and procedural irregularities in prosecutorial consent and jurisdiction certificate.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal challenging convictions for unlawful possession of government trophies and ammunition, upholding the 20-year sentence.
The trial court lacked jurisdiction due to defective certificate and consent, which failed to refer to all offences cited in the charge sheet; thus, the proceedings, conviction, and sentence are nullified and a retrial is ordered.
Source excerpt
The trial court lacked jurisdiction as the consent for prosecution was invalidly issued under section 26(1) EOCCA by a State Attorney Incharge, not the DPP, rendering the proceedings a nullity.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal over wildlife offences, quashing the conviction after finding exhibit and proof defects and ordering release unless lawfully held.
The trial court lacked jurisdiction due to defective consent and certificate that did not specify the law and offences charged, rendering the proceedings and judgment a nullity. The evidence on record was insufficient to sustain conviction, and a retrial would only allow the prosecution to fill evidentiary gaps, which is not in the interest of justice. The appellant is acquitted on all counts.
Source excerpt
Explore more
