legal and human rights centre and another v attorney general of the united republic of tanzania reference no192019 2024 eacj 5 27 march 2024
The Court found that the impugned Act passed the three-part test: the limitations were prescribed by law and clear, the objectives were pressing and substantial, and the measures were proportionate to the objectives. The Applicants failed to prove that the Act violated the Treaty or Protocol. Therefore, the challenged provisions do not contravene the cited Treaty or Protocol articles.
Source excerpt
- Validity of national legislation
- Public participation
- Rule of law
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Freedom of association