SOSTENESS JOSEPH Vs
The appellant failed to prove ownership of the disputed land or how he acquired it, while the respondent's evidence of acquisition and continued use since 1982 was unchallenged and more credible. The trial tribunal was justified in declaring the respondent the lawful owner of the disputed land, but the order was varied to limit ownership to three acres, the actual subject of dispute.
Source excerpt
- Burden of proof
- Ownership of land
- Standard of proof
- Appellate review
- Variation of orders