The High Court allowed Michael John’s first criminal appeal, finding the theft conviction unsafe because the prosecution evidence and identification were unreliable.
The appellant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that he purchased 24 acres of land from the respondents' father due to lack of documentary evidence and inconsistencies with prior judicial findings; thus, the DLHT's decision was upheld.
The Court of Appeal upheld a murder conviction, rejecting arguments on intoxication, burden of proof, and witness-listing errors, though it expunged improperly admitted exhibits.
The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to contradictory and unreliable victim testimony and improper admission of the appellant's cautioned statement; thus, conviction and sentence cannot stand.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal from Katavi, quashing a conviction for unnatural offence after finding the prosecution evidence insufficient and uncorroborated.
The Court of Appeal overturned a rape conviction after finding doubts over the offence location, witness credibility, and conflicts in the medical evidence.
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against a rape conviction, holding that the victim’s age was proved and that missing witnesses did not defeat the case.
The High Court’s Land Division granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal, finding the applicant raised arguable grounds on witness demeanor and limitation.
The conviction was quashed because the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to variance between the charge and evidence, unresolved contradictions in prosecution witness testimonies, absence of key witnesses, and failure to comply with mandatory procedural requirements prejudicing the appellant's right to a fair trial.
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania upheld an armed robbery conviction, holding the evidence proved the charge beyond reasonable doubt and rejected procedural complaints.