Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
There was no material before the Court to justify exercising discretion to allow extension of time to file written submissions; failure to comply with Rule 106(1) is fatal and the appeal is not maintainable.
Source excerpt
The applicant's failure to file written submissions as directed and absence without notice constitutes want of prosecution, warranting dismissal of the application with costs.
Source excerpt
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to file written submissions as ordered, which constitutes failure to prosecute the application.
Source excerpt
Appellant failed to pay court fees within the time ordered, rendering the filing incomplete and constituting non-appearance; application dismissed for want of prosecution.
Source excerpt
The applicant's failure to pay the requisite court fees within the time set for filing written submissions constituted non-compliance with court orders, amounting to non-appearance and warranting dismissal for want of prosecution.
Source excerpt
Defendants failed to file written submissions on time, amounting to default appearance; preliminary objection is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Source excerpt
The High Court in Shinyanga dismissed an application to extend time after the applicant failed to file written submissions on time and offered no sufficient explanation.
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal for want of prosecution after the appellant failed to file written submissions on time and gave no sufficient cause.
Appellants' repeated failure to comply with binding court orders for filing written submissions, despite multiple extensions and warnings, constitutes failure to prosecute the appeal, justifying dismissal for want of prosecution with costs.
Source excerpt
Appellant's failure to file written submissions in chief within the prescribed time constituted non-compliance with court orders and is equivalent to failure to prosecute, warranting dismissal of the appeal.
Source excerpt
Explore more
