Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law esther aman vs republic 2020 tzca 1907 17 december 2020

esther aman vs republic 2020 tzca 1907 17 december 2020

The trial was vitiated by irregular summing up to assessors, improper chain of custody of exhibits, failure to call material witnesses, and lack of conclusive proof of cause of death. The prosecution did not prove the charge of murder beyond reasonable doubt. Retrial would only serve to fill evidentiary gaps, which is impermissible.

  • Murder
  • Chain of custody
  • Summation to assessors
  • Evidence
  • Accomplice testimony
  • Retrial
Read case analysis
Criminal law 20180720 TZHC Mbeya2

20180720 TZHC Mbeya2

The High Court allowed a criminal appeal against a rape conviction, finding the case depended on uncorroborated accomplice evidence and was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

  • Rape
  • Evidence
  • Accomplice testimony
  • Standard of proof
  • Criminal-law
  • Accomplice-testimony
Read case analysis
Criminal law 20150114 TZHC Mbeya

20150114 TZHC Mbeya

The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed convictions for forgery and stealing by public servant, and set aside the sentence for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

  • Forgery
  • Stealing by public servant
  • Conspiracy
  • Standard of proof
  • Evidence
  • Accomplice testimony
Read case analysis
Criminal law 20140908 TZHC Mwanza

20140908 TZHC Mwanza

High Court criminal appeal dismissed after the court upheld a theft conviction, finding the evidence and exhibits proved the appellant’s role in the bank fraud.

  • Theft
  • Forgery
  • Uttering false documents
  • Bank fraud
  • Evidence evaluation
  • Accomplice testimony
Read case analysis
Criminal law paul fredrick mzinga vs republic 2014 tzhc 2413 13 january 2014

paul fredrick mzinga vs republic 2014 tzhc 2413 13 january 2014

The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed convictions for forgery and stealing by public servant, and set aside the sentence for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

  • Forgery
  • Stealing by public servant
  • Conspiracy
  • Standard of proof
  • Evidence
  • Accomplice testimony
Read case analysis
Criminal law idd ramadhani and 3 others vs the republic 2011 tzhc 2098 5 august 2011

idd ramadhani and 3 others vs the republic 2011 tzhc 2098 5 august 2011

The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, holding the convictions unsafe because they rested on uncorroborated co-accused evidence and proof beyond reasonable doubt was lacking.

  • Office breaking
  • Theft
  • Evidence
  • Accomplice testimony
  • Corroboration
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law 20110805 TZHC Dodoma

20110805 TZHC Dodoma

The conviction of the appellants was unsafe as it was based solely on the uncorroborated evidence of a co-accused, and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

  • Office breaking
  • Theft
  • Evidence
  • Accomplice testimony
  • Corroboration
Read case analysis
Criminal law 197702011 TZHC Tabora

197702011 TZHC Tabora

The convictions were quashed because the evidence against both appellants was insufficient and unreliable; the only witness against Stephen John was considered an accomplice and uncorroborated, and there was no admissible evidence against Haruna Athunani.

  • Robbery with violence
  • Evidence
  • Accomplice testimony
  • Identification
Read case analysis
Criminal law 20070725 TZHC Mwanza

20070725 TZHC Mwanza

The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal, upholding conviction for armed robbery on recent possession evidence and rejecting the alibi challenge.

  • Armed robbery
  • Doctrine of recent possession
  • Alibi
  • Evidence assessment
  • Accomplice testimony
  • Armed-robbery
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.