new hope initiative vs amina mhina 2021 tzhc 9142 13 december 2021
The respondent's termination was substantively fair due to admitted gross misconduct, but procedurally unfair as she was not afforded a right to be heard before the disciplinary hearing due to circumstances beyond her control. The arbitrator was justified in granting condonation for late filing. Compensation is not warranted where gross misconduct is admitted.
Source excerpt
- Unfair termination
- Condonation of late filing
- Right to be heard
- Disciplinary hearing
- Admission of misconduct