Criminal Appeal No
The prosecution failed to prove the existence of an agency relationship, which is essential for the offence of stealing by agent under section 273(b) of the Penal Code. However, the evidence established all elements of theft and demonstrated that the appellant obtained the goods by false pretence with intent to defraud, supporting a conviction for the minor and cognate offence of obtaining goods by false pretence under section 302 of the Penal Code.
Source excerpt
- Stealing by agent
- Obtaining goods by false pretence
- Elements of theft
- Agency relationship
- Minor and cognate offences
- Substitution of charges