Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal upheld Joshua Mulindwa’s convictions for breaking into a school and stealing documents, but reduced prison terms imposed beyond the magistrate’s powers.
The appellants failed to give prior notice of alibi as required by law, and the trial court properly exercised its discretion in according no weight to the alibi. The appellants were caught red handed at the scene, rendering identification issues irrelevant. Discrepancies in witness testimony were trivial and did not affect the prosecution's case. The prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashing a conviction for breaking into a building and receiving stolen property due to weak identification, search, and custody evidence.
High Court criminal appeal allowed after finding weak identification of stolen property, flawed search evidence, failure to call a key witness, and ignored alibi.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, finding the prosecution had not proved the appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt on breaking, theft, or neglect to prevent offence.
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant committed the offences charged, as the evidence was purely circumstantial and not sufficiently connected to the appellant. There was no direct evidence or corroboration that the appellant had knowledge of the theft or neglected to prevent it.
Source excerpt
High Court criminal appeal on recent possession and alibi, where the court upheld a conviction for breaking into a building and stealing cash.
The High Court quashed Simon Mapunda’s conviction for breaking into a store and set aside his five-year sentence, finding no proof beyond reasonable doubt.
The High Court at Mwanza upheld convictions and a seven-year sentence for breaking into a building and committing a felony, dismissing the appeal.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal after finding no evidence proved breaking or stealing, and held the identification evidence was based on suspicion.
Explore more
