Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against a rape conviction, holding that the child victim’s testimony was credible, corroborated, and supported by medical evidence.
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal, upholding a rape conviction and sentence. It found exhibit-admission irregularities but held the victim’s evidence and corroboration proved the case.
The High Court allowed the appeal, quashed the conviction for grave sexual abuse, and ordered the appellant’s release after finding reasonable doubt.
Failure by the trial court to comply with mandatory procedural requirements under sections 210(3) and 231(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act prejudiced the appellant's right to defence and vitiated the proceedings, rendering the conviction and sentence a nullity.
Source excerpt
The prosecution proved the offence of rape beyond reasonable doubt through the victim's direct evidence, corroborated by medical and circumstantial evidence. Contradictions regarding the victim's age and procedural complaints were immaterial or unsubstantiated. The conviction and sentence were upheld.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, holding that the identification parade had no value because the child witness gave no prior description of the suspect.
The conviction was quashed because the trial court failed to comply with section 127(2) of the Evidence Act, did not properly assess the credibility of the victim, failed to call material witnesses, and the prosecution did not prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
Court of Appeal upheld a rape conviction and 30-year sentence, finding the charge proper, the child’s evidence admissible, and proof beyond reasonable doubt.
The High Court allowed an appeal against a conviction for grave sexual abuse, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
The conviction was unsafe due to unreliable and contradictory prosecution evidence, failure to call material witnesses, exclusion of medical evidence, and negative DNA findings; doubts must be resolved in favour of the appellant.
Source excerpt
Explore more
