Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The suit was struck out for failure to comply with section 6(2) of the Government Proceedings Act, as plaintiffs neither served nor sent the required notice to the Attorney General, and this court follows its own precedents on mandatory compliance.
Source excerpt
Appeal before District Court was filed out of time without leave, representation by Mohamed Salum for other respondents lacked documentary proof, and lower courts' proceedings were tainted by procedural irregularities; decisions and proceedings of both lower courts are nullified and set aside.
Source excerpt
The valuation report was improperly admitted as it was a photocopy without proper certification or proof of loss of the original, violating mandatory evidentiary rules. Without the report, there was no evidence to support the claim for compensation, and the appeal lacked merit.
Source excerpt
The appeal was dismissed because credible and overwhelming evidence established that the appellant's animals destroyed the respondent's crops, and the compensation and fine orders were lawfully imposed based on proper valuation and legal principles.
Source excerpt
The appeal was dismissed because the evidence overwhelmingly established that the appellant's animals destroyed the respondent's crops, the trial and first appellate courts properly evaluated the evidence, and the compensation and fine orders were legally justified.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a crop-damage appeal, set aside the lower courts’ decisions, found errors in proof and procedure, and ordered a fresh hearing.
The High Court of Tanzania at Mwanza allowed an appeal over crop-destruction compensation, found errors in proof and procedure, and ordered a retrial.
High Court appeal over crop-damage compensation was dismissed. The court upheld findings that the evidence was unreliable, though it confirmed no power of attorney was needed in primary court.
Appeal over compensation for crop destruction by cattle. The High Court restored the Primary Court’s award of shs 2,000 and set aside the District Court’s reduction.
A Tanzanian High Court appeal on crop-destruction compensation under customary law was dismissed, with the compensation order and costs left unchanged.
Explore more
